The rapidly developing Internet of Things (IoT) market is being enabled by various wireless technologies. A recent addition to this already crowded market is narrowband-IoT (NB-IoT). This modified version of the established 4G LTE technology uses narrower channels (i.e. 200-kHz compared to 10-MHz for LTE use).
The fast pace of NB-IoT standardization during 2016 suggests there is demand for its commercial deployment, to address a wide array of IoT uses over cellular networks. There are similarities between some of these uses and those being associated with 5G services. However, NB-IoT provides an immediate solution for mobile operators to create successful IoT businesses well before 5G becomes a commercial reality.
Performance implications of different NB-IoT deployment options
From the perspective of the radio access network (RAN) there are three NB-IoT deployment options.
Two of these options are suitable for deployment in spectrum that has already been licensed: an ‘in-band’ option, where NB-IoT is deployed within existing LTE spectrum used for mobile broadband (MBB) services; a ‘guard-band’ option using spectrum at the channel edges of existing LTE carriers (where roll-off from spectral emissions creates ‘in-band guard bands’, which can be used without taking capacity from the main LTE traffic carriers)
The third option is to deploy NB-IoT using a separate assignment of spectrum (i.e. ‘standalone’ deployment), and different LTE frequency carriers from those assigned to mobile operators for MBB use.
To date, regulators have not assigned separate frequencies for NB-IoT, although this approach is available. For example, it would be possible to assign IoT spectrum from the 700-MHz band (so-called ‘2×3MHz’, from 733–736MHz and 788–791MHz). This 2×3MHz spectrum is adjacent to the main MBB-focused 700MHz band plan (as shown in Figure 1 below )and so would have no impact on the amount of spectrum available for MBB.
There appear to be various advantages of using separately assigned spectrum rather than an in-band deployment. For example, operators could deploy IoT services without taking up spectrum resource and/or affecting the quality of service of MBB services. Similarly, although the guard-band solution uses less MBB capacity than the in-band deployment option, it is unlikely the guard-band solution can offer the same levels of performance as when using separately assigned spectrum, due to more limited prospects for optimizing site placement, coverage and capacity for the IoT traffic.
There could also be other benefits from using separate spectrum, including the possibility of optimizing RANs to provide superior indoor coverage. There might also be device upsides, such as a reduction in power consumption from having better indoor coverage. Some IoT use cases require high levels of network availability due to the nature of traffic being carried (e.g. applications within the healthcare sector, or connections to/from vehicles). Separately assigned spectrum could provide more reliable connections for these situations, whilst also leveraging existing sites and network assets (e.g. billing and security).
Major telcos’ plans for in-band deployment could compromise performance
Despite the performance compromises noted above, Vodafone’s plans to offer NB-IoT services in markets across Europe involve using its existing 800-MHz spectrum.
Vodafone has indicated that this is because its 800-MHz LTE RAN is ready to support NB-IoT (i.e. most sites can be software upgraded and current systems can be updated quickly without needing extensive additional infrastructure). One of the key benefits for Vodafone is likely to be speed to market. However, given the rapid increase in MBB traffic reported recently, and forecasts of continued strong growth (see Figure 2), it could be challenging to support IoT and MBB traffic within the same carriers without compromising network performance.
Vodafone’s spectrum portfolio (including 2.6GHz spectrum and sub-1GHz bands such as 900MHz) might help to reduce any impact on network performance. However, other mobile operators with smaller spectrum holdings may be less able to mitigate this effect.
Industry sources point to key benefits of NB-IoT being quality of service and the possibility of re-using LTE infrastructure (e.g. sites, backhaul and core network capabilities). LTE infrastructure can be re-used whether deploying within existing LTE MBB spectrum or in separately assigned carrier(s). However, quality of service depends on the spectrum being used – the possibility of mobile operators capturing a significant share of IoT traffic is important in this regard, since as traffic levels grow the quality of service for both IoT and MBB will decline (unless separate spectrum is available).
Regulators unconvinced about need to assign separate spectrum for IoT
The lack of harmonized spectrum for NB-IoT suggests that regulators are unconvinced about a market need for separately assigned spectrum. If separate spectrum were to be made available several policy questions could arise, such as: How many separate networks can be supported in 2×3MHz? How many networks are required? Are there competition implications for the MBB market?
With no regionally or globally harmonized solution for separately assigned spectrum, it seems likely that early deployments will follow Vodafone’s model of in-band deployment. Ultimately, the success or otherwise of these early launches of NB-IoT using capacity from LTE carriers could determine whether further dedicated spectrum is needed.
Source: http://www.telecomasia.net/content/successful-deployment-nb-iot-will-depend-spectrum-choices